Online Courses that I Recommend

Create: March 17, 2024

My journey of learning from online courses started from 2013, and over the years I took a lot of them, abandoning even more along the way. Nevertheless, I've found online courses to be far more accommodating for self-study compared to traditional books.

In this post, I've compiled a list of courses that I found memorable, enjoyable, and, in retrospection, actually convey high-quality information. While the selection is undoubtedly biased towards my personal interests, I hope you find them useful as well.

Do note that some courses that I recommend below are not MOOCs, but instead university courses that happened to have lecture recordings, assignments, and other course material freely available from past offerings. As a result, you may need to do some extra digging to locate the course material.

Meta-Learning

  • Learning How to Learn — "Learning how to learn" is an essential skill that I find people, including myself, quite lacking. Some people may consider this one offer pretty "obvious" advices. It is true that most actionable advices taught in this course are not new. However, I don't think it is right to dismiss the course as "common sense," for common senses are often contradictionary with each other. This course, instead, offers scientific validation for effective learning practices.

Math

Calculus

Linear algebra

  • MIT OCW Linear Algebra by Prof. Gilbert Strang as main course — If you spend some time doing online learning for math, it is likely you already heard the name of Prof. Strang.

Discrete Math

Computer Science and Programming

Intro

  • Stanford CS106A, 106B, and 106L — These were course series that start my Computer Science Journey. The 2008 edition that I took was way too old and outdated, but there are newer versions of offering online.

Computer Graphics and GPU Programming

Programming Languages and Compilers

  • Programming Languages by University of Washington [Part A] [Part B] [Part C] — A three part courses on programming languages. I find the content quite shallow compare to the undergrad PL course I took at university, but it serves a good introduction and Prof. Dan Grossman is enthuastic about the topics.
  • CS 6120: Advanced Compilers by Cornell university — mainly talks about compiler optimization

System Programming

  • CMU 15-213/15-513 Introduction to Computer Systems
    • The CSAPP textbook used by this course is a classic. Though do note that there are some serious misinfo regarding C
      • For years I thought signed-integer overflow has wrapping behavior in C because of this book
  • Nand2Tetris — If you want a single survey course that covers from logic gate, computer architecture, assembly, and OS, then this is a course for you. Of course, it covers none of the topics in depth, but still an awesome course nonetheless.

Miscs

Psychology

Physics

Tips on finding good courses

My observation is that traditional university courses (such as the ones from MIT OCW) have higher quality on average than MOOCs. Unfornately, most university courses lack lecture videos, which I considered indispensity. On the other hand, while lecture videos are invaluable, courses relying solely on videos—a common occurrence on Youtube—are not enough. Prefer courses with a lot of supplementary materials and homework.

Another tip: for courses on platforms with reviews, take a moment to read the 1-star and 2-star ratings. While most of these reviews are nonsensical, if you notice consistent red flags, then maybe this is not the right course for you. This same approach can also be applied when assessing whether a book is worth reading.

Highly Regarded Courses that I don't recommend

Similar to university courses, the majority of online courses I've enrolled in have left much to be desired. Most were forgettable, filled with platitude and lacking information density. Below are a few that were particularly problematic that I can still remember now.

  • Social Psychology by Wesleyan University — Presented lots of exaggerated claims and falsified theories such as "video game causes violence." Also quoating controversial studies such as Stanford Prison and Milgram experiments. I guess this course can serve as a cautious tale of scientific progress and not everything your learn is true. Though since I took it in 2015, I am not sure if this course changes now.

  • Fundamentals of Music Theory By the University of Edinburgh — Rudimentary lectures followed by extremely hard quizzes that are impossible to complete without a lot of extra googling